What could have we been missing while Pauli's Theorem was in force?
| dc.creator | Galapon, Eric A. | |
| dc.date | 2003-03-18 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T06:06:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T06:06:22Z | |
| dc.description | Pauli's theorem asserts that the canonical commutation relation $[T,H]=iI$ only admits Hilbert space solutions that form a system of imprimitivities on the real line, so that only non-self-adjoint time operators exist in single Hilbert quantum mechanics. This, however, is contrary to the fact that there is a large class of solutions to $[T,H]=iI$, including self-adjoint time operator solutions for semibounded and discrete Hamiltonians. Consequently the theorem has brushed aside and downplayed the rest of the solution set of the time-energy canonical commutation relation. | |
| dc.description | To appear in the proceedings of the ``International Colloquium in Time and Matter,'' Venice, Italy, August 11-24, 2002 (World Scientific). 12 pages | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0303106 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0303106 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/90950 | |
| dc.subject | Quantum Physics | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Theory | |
| dc.title | What could have we been missing while Pauli's Theorem was in force? | |
| dc.type | text |