An Upper Bound on the Higgs Boson Mass from Yukawa Unification and a Comment on Vacuum Stability Constraints
| dc.creator | Polonsky, Nir | |
| dc.date | 1994-06-03 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T03:56:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T03:56:53Z | |
| dc.description | Only small regions in the $m_{t} - \tanβ$ plane are allowed when considering simultaneously (assuming the MSSM) coupling constant unification and (minimal) GUT relations among Yukawa couplings (i.e., $h_{b} = h_τ$ at the unification point). In particular, if $m_{t} \simle 175$ GeV we find that only $1 \simle \tanβ\simle 1.5$ or $\tanβ\simgr 40 \pm 10$ is allowed. The former implies that the light Higgs boson is $\simle 110$ GeV and, in principle, visible to LEPII. The prediction for the Higgs boson mass in the $\tanβ\approx 1$ scenario is discussed and uncertainties related to ($i$) vacuum stability constraints, ($ii$) different methods for calculating the Higgs boson mass, ($iii$) two-loop calculations and ($iv$) GUT corrections are briefly reviewed. It is shown that large left-right mixing between the $t$-scalars can significantly enhance the Higgs boson mass. That and an ambiguity in the size of the two-loop correction lead to our conservative upper bound of 110 GeV. Vacuum stability considerations constrain the $t$-scalar mixing and slightly diminish the upper bound (depending on the value of $m_{t}$). Improved two-loop calculations are also expected to strengthen the bound. | |
| dc.description | talk presented at SUSY-94, 7 pages, LaTex, uuencoded postscript file (including 5 figures) is attached. Also available via anonymous ftp from dept.physics.upenn.edu (dir pub). Report No. UPR-0595T | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9406225 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9406225 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/45177 | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | |
| dc.title | An Upper Bound on the Higgs Boson Mass from Yukawa Unification and a Comment on Vacuum Stability Constraints | |
| dc.type | text |