Static vs. dynamical mean field theory of Mott antiferromagnets
| dc.creator | Sangiovanni, G. | |
| dc.creator | Toschi, A. | |
| dc.creator | Koch, E. | |
| dc.creator | Held, K. | |
| dc.creator | Capone, M. | |
| dc.creator | Castellani, C. | |
| dc.creator | Gunnarsson, O. | |
| dc.creator | Mo, S. -K. | |
| dc.creator | Allen, J. W. | |
| dc.creator | Kim, H. -D. | |
| dc.creator | Sekiyama, A. | |
| dc.creator | Yamasaki, A. | |
| dc.creator | Suga, S. | |
| dc.creator | Metcalf, P. | |
| dc.date | 2005-11-17 | |
| dc.date | 2006-06-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T08:22:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T08:22:38Z | |
| dc.description | Studying the antiferromagnetic phase of the Hubbard model by dynamical mean field theory, we observe striking differences with static (Hartree-Fock) mean field: The Slater band is strongly renormalized and spectral weight is transferred to spin-polaron side bands. Already for intermediate values of the interaction $U$ the overall bandwidth is larger than in Hartree-Fock, and the gap is considerably smaller. Such differences survive any renormalization of $U$. Our photoemission experiments for Cr-doped V$_2$O$_3$ show spectra qualitatively well described by dynamical mean field theory. | |
| dc.description | 6 pages, 5 figures - one figure added and further details about quasiparticle dispersion | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0511442 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0511442 | |
| dc.identifier | Phys. Rev. B 73, 205121 (2006) | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205121 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/135721 | |
| dc.subject | Strongly Correlated Electrons | |
| dc.title | Static vs. dynamical mean field theory of Mott antiferromagnets | |
| dc.type | text |