Cat's Dilemma - transitivity vs. intransitivity

dc.creatorPiotrowski, Edward W.
dc.creatorMakowski, Marcin
dc.date2004-08-05
dc.date2005-01-31
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:52:24Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T05:52:24Z
dc.descriptionWe study a simple example of a sequential game illustrating problems connected with making rational decisions that are universal for social sciences. The set of chooser's optimal decisions that manifest his preferences in case of a constant strategy of the adversary (the offering player), is investigated. It turns out that the order imposed by the player's rational preferences can be intransitive. The presented quantitative results imply a revision of the "common sense" opinions stating that preferences showing intransitivity are paradoxical and undesired.
dc.descriptionsubmitted to Fluctuation and Noise Letters
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408022
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408022
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/86312
dc.subjectPhysics and Society
dc.subjectData Analysis, Statistics and Probability
dc.titleCat's Dilemma - transitivity vs. intransitivity
dc.typetext

Files

Collections