Discussion: Are There Material Objects in Bohm's Theory

Simple item page
dc.creatorDickson, Michael
dc.date2000-03-22
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:59:45Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T05:59:45Z
dc.descriptionBedard has argued that the 'minimalist' interpretation of Bohm's theory "do[es] not make sense", essentially because one cannot account for bonding properties in terms of particles cofigurations alone. I argue that while this point is correct, the minimalist interpretation never sought to provide such an explanation (nor is it incumbant upon this interpretation to do so).
dc.description13pp. A reply to Bedard (1999) Phil. Sci. 66:221
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003102
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003102
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/88797
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleDiscussion: Are There Material Objects in Bohm's Theory
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv