Are quantum `irreality' and `nonlocality' ineluctable?

dc.creatorKracklauer, A. F.
dc.date2006-10-20
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T07:30:25Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T07:30:25Z
dc.descriptionThe early history of the development of Quantum Mechanics is surveyed to discern the arguments leading to the introduction of the notions of `irreal' wave functions and `nonlocal' correlations. It is argued that the assumption that Quantum Mechanics is `complete', i.e., not just a variant of Statistical Mechanics, is the feature compelling the introduction of these otherwise problematic properties. Additionally, a consequence of the error first found by Jaynes in proofs of Bell's ``theorem'', is illustrated. Finally, speculation on the practical consequences of recognising that ``entanglement'' is a feature of all hyperbolic differential equations is proposed.
dc.description5 pages RevTeX
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610173
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610173
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/118450
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleAre quantum `irreality' and `nonlocality' ineluctable?
dc.typetext

Files

Collections