Are quantum `irreality' and `nonlocality' ineluctable?
| dc.creator | Kracklauer, A. F. | |
| dc.date | 2006-10-20 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T07:30:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T07:30:25Z | |
| dc.description | The early history of the development of Quantum Mechanics is surveyed to discern the arguments leading to the introduction of the notions of `irreal' wave functions and `nonlocal' correlations. It is argued that the assumption that Quantum Mechanics is `complete', i.e., not just a variant of Statistical Mechanics, is the feature compelling the introduction of these otherwise problematic properties. Additionally, a consequence of the error first found by Jaynes in proofs of Bell's ``theorem'', is illustrated. Finally, speculation on the practical consequences of recognising that ``entanglement'' is a feature of all hyperbolic differential equations is proposed. | |
| dc.description | 5 pages RevTeX | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610173 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610173 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/118450 | |
| dc.subject | Quantum Physics | |
| dc.title | Are quantum `irreality' and `nonlocality' ineluctable? | |
| dc.type | text |