Differences between the trajectory representation and Copenhagen regarding the past and present in quantum theory

Simple item page
dc.creatorFloyd, Edward R.
dc.date2003-07-12
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:07:19Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:07:19Z
dc.descriptionWe examine certain pasts and presents in the classically forbidden region. We show that for a given past the trajectory representation does not permit some presents while the Copenhagen predicts a finite probability for these presents to exist. This suggests another gedanken experiment to invalidate either Copenhagen or the trajectory representation.
dc.description4 pages REVTEX4. No figures. Submitted to "Proceedings for the Eighth International Wigner Symposium" (WYGSYM 8), 27-30 May 2003, CUNY, NY, NY
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307090
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307090
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/91250
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.subjectHigh Energy Physics - Theory
dc.titleDifferences between the trajectory representation and Copenhagen regarding the past and present in quantum theory
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv