A counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev

dc.creatorMuscalu, Camil
dc.creatorTao, Terence
dc.creatorThiele, Christoph
dc.date2001-08-23
dc.date2002-02-14
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T04:43:05Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T04:43:05Z
dc.descriptionChrist and Kiselev have established that the generalized eigenfunctions of one-dimensional Dirac operators with $L^p$ potential $F$ are bounded for almost all energies for $p < 2$. Roughly speaking, the proof involved writing these eigenfunctions as a multilinear series $\sum_n T_n(F, ..., F)$ and carefully bounding each term $T_n(F, ..., F)$. It is conjectured that the results of Christ and Kiselev also hold for $L^2$ potentials $F$. However in this note we show that the bilinear term $T_2(F,F)$ and the trilinear term $T_3(F,F,F)$ are badly behaved on $L^2$, which seems to indicate that multilinear expansions are not the right tool for tackling this endpoint case.
dc.description9 pages, no figures, to appear, Math. Res. Letters. More detailed remarks, many minor changes
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0108156
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0108156
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/62065
dc.subjectClassical Analysis and ODEs
dc.subjectAnalysis of PDEs
dc.subject42B15; 42B25, 35P20
dc.titleA counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev
dc.typetext

Files

Collections