Reply to ``Comments on Kullback-Leibler and renormalized entropies: Applications to electroencephalograms of epilepsy patients"

Simple item page
dc.creatorQuiroga, R. Quian
dc.creatorArnhold, J.
dc.creatorLehnertz, K.
dc.creatorGrassberger, P.
dc.date2002-08-07
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T02:46:46Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T02:46:46Z
dc.descriptionKopitzki et al (preceeding comment) claim that the relationship between Renormalized and Kullback-Leibler entropies has already been given in their previous papers. Moreover, they argue that the first can give more useful information for e.g. localizing the seizure-generating area in epilepsy patients. In our reply we stress that if the relationship between both entropies would have been known by them, they should have noticed that the condition on the effective temperature is unnecessary. Indeed, this condition led them to choose different reference segments for different channels, even if this was physiologically unplausible. Therefore, we still argue that it is very unlikely that renormalized entropy will give more information than the conventional Kullback-Leibler entropy.
dc.description4 pages, 1 figure. Phys. Rev. E, in press
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0208148
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0208148
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/19752
dc.subjectStatistical Mechanics
dc.subjectChaotic Dynamics
dc.subjectBiological Physics
dc.subjectQuantitative Biology
dc.titleReply to ``Comments on Kullback-Leibler and renormalized entropies: Applications to electroencephalograms of epilepsy patients"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv