Comment on ``Phase Coexistence in Multifragmentation''

dc.creatorGross, D. H. E.
dc.creatorBotvina, A. S.
dc.date1996-07-18
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:37:39Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T05:37:39Z
dc.descriptionThis comment on Moretto et al.PRL 76:372,1996 argues that the IMF-charge distribution may not be useful as signal for phase-transitions in nuclear multifragmentation. Fluctuations of different origin may corrupt this signal. Energy conservation is as important as charge conservation. The caloric equation of state is more safe.
dc.description1 page, includes 1 figure
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/9607010
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/9607010
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/81354
dc.subjectNuclear Experiment
dc.titleComment on ``Phase Coexistence in Multifragmentation''
dc.typetext

Files

Collections