Commutative Geometries are Spin Manifolds
| dc.creator | Rennie, A. | |
| dc.date | 1999-03-11 | |
| dc.date | 1999-10-28 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T04:32:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T04:32:44Z | |
| dc.description | In [1], Connes presented axioms governing noncommutative geometry. He went on to claim that when specialised to the commutative case, these axioms recover spin or spin^c geometry depending on whether the geometry is ''real'' or not. We attempt to flesh out the details of Connes' ideas. As an illustration we present a proof of his claim, partly extending the validity of the result to pseudo-Riemannian spin manifolds. Throughout we are as explicit and elementary as possible. | |
| dc.description | Re-tex to get references right. This is a revised version of a previously incorrect version. Changes to the central portion of proof are extensive. 48 pp | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/9903021 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/9903021 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/58300 | |
| dc.subject | Mathematical Physics | |
| dc.subject | Differential Geometry | |
| dc.subject | Functional Analysis | |
| dc.title | Commutative Geometries are Spin Manifolds | |
| dc.type | text |