Comment on Mermin's Recent Proof of the Theorem of Bell

Simple item page
dc.creatorHess, Karl
dc.creatorPhilipp, Walter
dc.date2002-07-18
dc.date2002-07-21
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:04:38Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:04:38Z
dc.descriptionMermin states in a recent paper that his nontechnical version of Bell's theorem stands and is not invalidated by time and setting dependent instrument parameters as claimed in one of our previous papers. We identify a number of misinterpretations (of our definitions) and mathematical inconsistencies in Mermin's paper and show that Mermin's conclusions are therefore not valid: his proof does not go forward if certain possible time dependencies are taken into account.
dc.description6 pages
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0207110
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0207110
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/90363
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleComment on Mermin's Recent Proof of the Theorem of Bell
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv