Constraints, Exceptions and Representations
| dc.creator | Ellison, T. Mark | |
| dc.date | 1995-04-26 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T09:09:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T09:09:46Z | |
| dc.description | This paper shows that default-based phonologies have the potential to capture morphophonological generalisations which cannot be captured by non-defaul theories. In achieving this result, I offer a characterisation of Underspecification Theory and Optimality Theory in terms of their methods for ordering defaults. The result means that machine learning techniques for building non-defualt analyses may not provide a suitable basis for morphophonological analysis. | |
| dc.description | 9 pages postscript | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9504022 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9504022 | |
| dc.identifier | (Proc of ACL SIGPHON First Meeting) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/151157 | |
| dc.subject | Computation and Language | |
| dc.title | Constraints, Exceptions and Representations | |
| dc.type | text |