"Quantum mysteries for anyone," or classical verities for everyone?
| dc.creator | Kracklauer, A. F. | |
| dc.creator | Kracklauer, N. A. | |
| dc.date | 2000-07-27 | |
| dc.date | 2001-08-13 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T06:00:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T06:00:29Z | |
| dc.description | Unarticulated, implicit hypotheses in Bell's analysis of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) correlations are identified and examined. These relate to the mathematical-analytical properties of random variables, the character of the relevant sample spaces and physical interpretations. We shown that continuous hidden variables are not precluded by Bell inequalities. Finally, we propose a local realistic model of optical EPRB experiments and consider its implications. | |
| dc.description | 10 pages LaTeX v2: Noted additional flaw in Bell's Theorem + wordsmithing v 3: Moderate revamp with argument tuning; v4 edit + new EPR model | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0007101 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0007101 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/88986 | |
| dc.subject | Quantum Physics | |
| dc.title | "Quantum mysteries for anyone," or classical verities for everyone? | |
| dc.type | text |