Consistency of "the ideal of null restricted to some A is kappa-complete not kappa^+-complete, kappa weakly inaccessible and cov(meagre)=aleph_1"

Simple item page
dc.creatorShelah, Saharon
dc.date2005-04-10
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:18:58Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T05:18:58Z
dc.descriptionIn this note we answer the following question of Grinblat: Is it consistent that for some set X, cov(NULL restriction X)=lambda is a weakly inaccessible cardinal (so X not null of course) while cov(meagre) is small, say it is aleph_1.
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0504201
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0504201
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/74851
dc.subjectLogic
dc.titleConsistency of "the ideal of null restricted to some A is kappa-complete not kappa^+-complete, kappa weakly inaccessible and cov(meagre)=aleph_1"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv