Comment on "Partial energies fluctuations and negative heat capacities" by X. Campi et al

dc.creatorChomaz, Ph.
dc.creatorGulminelli, F.
dc.creatorD'Agostino, M.
dc.date2004-07-16
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T09:49:12Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T09:49:12Z
dc.descriptionStudying the energy partioning published in nucl-th/0406056v2 we show that the presented results do not fulfill the sum rule due to energy conservation. The observed fluctuations of the energy conservation test point to a numerical problem. Moreover, analysis of the binding energies show that the fragment recognition algorithm adopted by Campi et al. leads with a sizeable probability to fragments containing up to the total mass even for excitation energies as large as 3/4 of the total binding. This surprising result points to another problem since the published inter-fragment energy is not zero while a unique fragment is present. This problem may be due to either the fragment recognition algorithm or to the definition of the inter and intra-fragment energy. These numerical inconsistencies should be settled before any conclusion on the physics can be drawn.
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0407047
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0407047
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/164496
dc.subjectNuclear Theory
dc.titleComment on "Partial energies fluctuations and negative heat capacities" by X. Campi et al
dc.typetext

Files

Collections