Why Self-Consistent Diagrammatic Perturbation Theory is `just' Perturbation Theory
| dc.creator | Setlur, Girish S. | |
| dc.date | 1999-08-19 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T03:14:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T03:14:16Z | |
| dc.description | In this short write-up we argue that self-consistent diagrammatic perturbation theory(i.e. Feynman diagrams) for the one-particle Green function is unable to capture some important qualitative features no matter how self-consistently the Green functions are obtained. This write-up is intended to highlight the short-comings of perturbation theory and also tout the advantages of the sea-boson technique(hep-th/9706006). | |
| dc.description | 3 pages, RevTex | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9908269 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9908269 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/29610 | |
| dc.subject | Condensed Matter | |
| dc.title | Why Self-Consistent Diagrammatic Perturbation Theory is `just' Perturbation Theory | |
| dc.type | text |