Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

dc.creatorKent, Adrian
dc.date1995-11-22
dc.date1997-03-22
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T09:05:06Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T09:05:06Z
dc.descriptionRecent work with Dowker on the scientific status of the consistent histories approach to quantum theory is reviewed and summarised. The approach is compared with formulations of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics and the Copenhagen interpretation a la Landau-Lifshitz, in which classical variables are explicitly appended. I try to explain why the consistent histories formulation is scientifically problematic, in that it is a very weak theory, but also scientifically interesting, shedding new light on quantum theory.
dc.description14 pages, TeX with harvmac. Minor corrections from previous archive version
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511032
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511032
dc.identifierPublished in ``Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal'', J. Cushing, A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds), Kluwer Academic Press (Dordrecht, 1996), pp. 343-352
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/149610
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleRemarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics
dc.typetext

Files

Collections