Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM"

Simple item page
dc.creatorAkhavan, O.
dc.creatorGolshani, M.
dc.date2003-05-05
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:06:42Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:06:42Z
dc.descriptionIn a recent paper, Struyve et al. [Struyve W, De Baere W, De Neve J and De Weirdt S 2003 J. Phys. A 36 1525] attempted to show that the thought experiment proposed in [Golshani M and Akhavan O 2001 J. Phys. A 34 5259, quant-ph/0103101] cannot distinguish between standard and Bohmian quantum mechanics. Here, we want to show that, in spite of their objection, our conclusion still holds out.
dc.description4 pages, no figures, Latex
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0305020
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0305020
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/91067
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleReply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv