Pile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average

Simple item page
dc.creatorBreidt, F. Jay
dc.creatorDavis, Richard A.
dc.creatorHsu, Nan-Jung
dc.creatorRosenblatt, Murray
dc.date2007-02-26
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:08:46Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T08:08:46Z
dc.descriptionThe first-order moving average model or MA(1) is given by $X_t=Z_t-θ_0Z_{t-1}$, with independent and identically distributed $\{Z_t\}$. This is arguably the simplest time series model that one can write down. The MA(1) with unit root ($θ_0=1$) arises naturally in a variety of time series applications. For example, if an underlying time series consists of a linear trend plus white noise errors, then the differenced series is an MA(1) with unit root. In such cases, testing for a unit root of the differenced series is equivalent to testing the adequacy of the trend plus noise model. The unit root problem also arises naturally in a signal plus noise model in which the signal is modeled as a random walk. The differenced series follows a MA(1) model and has a unit root if and only if the random walk signal is in fact a constant. The asymptotic theory of various estimators based on Gaussian likelihood has been developed for the unit root case and nearly unit root case ($θ=1+β/n,β\le0$). Unlike standard $1/\sqrt{n}$-asymptotics, these estimation procedures have $1/n$-asymptotics and a so-called pile-up effect, in which P$(\hatθ=1)$ converges to a positive value. One explanation for this pile-up phenomenon is the lack of identifiability of $θ$ in the Gaussian case. That is, the Gaussian likelihood has the same value for the two sets of parameter values $(θ,σ^2)$ and $(1/θ,θ^2σ^2$). It follows that $θ=1$ is always a critical point of the likelihood function. In contrast, for non-Gaussian noise, $θ$ is identifiable for all real values. Hence it is no longer clear whether or not the same pile-up phenomenon will persist in the non-Gaussian case. In this paper, we focus on limiting pile-up probabilities for estimates of $θ_0$ based on a Laplace likelihood. In some cases, these estimates can be viewed as Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) estimates. Simulation results illustrate the limit theory.
dc.descriptionPublished at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/074921706000000923 in the IMS Lecture Notes Monograph Series (http://www.imstat.org/publications/lecnotes.htm) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0702762
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0702762
dc.identifierIMS Lecture Notes Monograph Series 2006, Vol. 52, 1-19
dc.identifierdoi:10.1214/074921706000000923
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/131376
dc.subjectStatistics Theory
dc.subject62M10 (Primary) 60F05 (Secondary)
dc.titlePile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv