The chaotic chameleon
| dc.creator | Gill, Richard D. | |
| dc.date | 2003-07-29 | |
| dc.date | 2004-05-29 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T06:07:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T06:07:28Z | |
| dc.description | Various local hidden variables models for the singlet correlations exploit the detection loophole, or other loopholes connected with post-selection on coincident arrival times. I consider the connection with a probabilistic simulation technique called rejection-sampling, and pose some natural questions concerning what can be achieved and what cannot be achieved with local (or distributed) rejection sampling. In particular a new and more serious loophole, which we call the coincidence loophole, is introduced. | |
| dc.description | v.2: 7pp; conjecture 1 disproved by Gisin & Gisin (1999) but which leads to new open problems and conjectures. v.3: minor correction and addition. To appear in proceedings of "Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis", Greifswald, 2003; World Scientific. v.4: major revision in view of solution of another conjecture by Larsson & Gill (2003) | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307217 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307217 | |
| dc.identifier | pp. 269--276 in: M. Sch"urmann and U. Franz (eds.), Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis: from Foundations to Applications. QP--PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Volume 18 (2005). World Scientific. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/91305 | |
| dc.subject | Quantum Physics | |
| dc.subject | Probability | |
| dc.title | The chaotic chameleon | |
| dc.type | text |