Comment on: ``Nonextensivity: from low-dimensional maps to Hamiltonian systems'' by Tsallis et al

Simple item page
dc.creatorGross, D. H. E.
dc.date2002-10-21
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T02:47:50Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T02:47:50Z
dc.descriptionThe critique against using Boltzmann's microcanonical entropy, an "ensemble measure", as foundation of statistics is rebuffed. The confusion of the microcanonical distribution with the exponential Boltzmann-Gibbs (``BG'') distribution is pointed out. Boltzmann's principle is clearly superior over any Tsallis q-statistics in describing the equilibrium of small systems like nuclei and even self-gravitating systems as paradigm of non-extensive Hamiltonian systems.
dc.description2 pages, no figure
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0210448
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0210448
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/20162
dc.subjectStatistical Mechanics
dc.subjectNuclear Theory
dc.subjectAtomic and Molecular Clusters
dc.titleComment on: ``Nonextensivity: from low-dimensional maps to Hamiltonian systems'' by Tsallis et al
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv