Comment on "First-order phase transitions: equivalence between bimodalities and the Yang-Lee theorem"

dc.creatorTouchette, Hugo
dc.date2005-03-02
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:22:03Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:22:03Z
dc.descriptionI discuss the validity of a result put forward recently by Chomaz and Gulminelli [Physica A 330 (2003) 451] concerning the equivalence of two definitions of first-order phase transitions. I show that distributions of zeros of the partition function fulfilling the conditions of the Yang-Lee Theorem are not necessarily associated with nonconcave microcanonical entropy functions or, equivalently, with canonical distributions of the mean energy having a bimodal shape, as claimed by Chomaz and Gulminelli. In fact, such distributions of zeros can also be associated with concave entropy functions and unimodal canonical distributions having affine parts. A simple example is worked out in detail to illustrate this subtlety.
dc.description3 pages, revtex4, 1 figure
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503029
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503029
dc.identifierPhysica A 359, 375-379, 2005.
dc.identifierdoi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.05.098
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/95795
dc.subjectStatistical Mechanics
dc.titleComment on "First-order phase transitions: equivalence between bimodalities and the Yang-Lee theorem"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections