Module networks revisited: computational assessment and prioritization of model predictions

dc.creatorJoshi, Anagha
dc.creatorDe Smet, Riet
dc.creatorMarchal, Kathleen
dc.creatorVan de Peer, Yves
dc.creatorMichoel, Tom
dc.date2009-01-12
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T12:28:24Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T12:28:24Z
dc.descriptionThe solution of high-dimensional inference and prediction problems in computational biology is almost always a compromise between mathematical theory and practical constraints such as limited computational resources. As time progresses, computational power increases but well-established inference methods often remain locked in their initial suboptimal solution. We revisit the approach of Segal et al. (2003) to infer regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. In contrast to their direct optimization-based solution we use a more representative centroid-like solution extracted from an ensemble of possible statistical models to explain the data. The ensemble method automatically selects a subset of most informative genes and builds a quantitatively better model for them. Genes which cluster together in the majority of models produce functionally more coherent modules. Regulators which are consistently assigned to a module are more often supported by literature, but a single model always contains many regulator assignments not supported by the ensemble. Reliably detecting condition-specific or combinatorial regulation is particularly hard in a single optimum but can be achieved using ensemble averaging.
dc.description8 pages REVTeX, 6 figures
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1544
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1544
dc.identifierdoi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn658
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/215528
dc.subjectQuantitative Methods
dc.subjectMolecular Networks
dc.titleModule networks revisited: computational assessment and prioritization of model predictions
dc.typetext

Files

Collections