The instrument response function in air-based scanning tunneling microscopy
| dc.creator | Fraundorf, P. | |
| dc.creator | Tentschert, J. | |
| dc.date | 1997-12-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T05:55:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T05:55:58Z | |
| dc.description | The distinction between point and line resolution in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) arises because an ability to image sub-0.2 nm fringes is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for imaging individual atoms. In scanned tip microscopy, as in TEM, empirical data on instrument response should precede assertions about point resolution. In the ``slow scan limit'', time-domain noise and geometry effects decouple, and tip shape can take on the role of a 2-dimensional impulse response function. We indicate here that nuclear track pits can be used to quantitatively measure tip geometry with nanometer-scale resolution in three dimensions, that stationary tip images provide a robust measure of time-domain instabilities, and that when these data are taken before and after imaging an unknown, images with instrument response quantitatively constrained by experiment are possible. Specimen-induced tip effects also become measurable in situ. | |
| dc.description | 4 pages (1 fig, 16 refs) RevTeX; apps http://newton.umsl.edu/stei_lab/ | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9712003 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9712003 | |
| dc.identifier | Ultramicroscopy 37 (1991) 125-129 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/87439 | |
| dc.subject | Instrumentation and Detectors | |
| dc.subject | Materials Science | |
| dc.subject | Optics | |
| dc.title | The instrument response function in air-based scanning tunneling microscopy | |
| dc.type | text |