Ghost Imaging: What is quantum, what is not
| dc.creator | Erkmen, Baris I. | |
| dc.creator | Shapiro, Jeffrey H. | |
| dc.date | 2006-12-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T07:35:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T07:35:10Z | |
| dc.description | We provide a unified treatment of classical and quantum Gaussian-state sources that unambiguously identifies which features of ghost imaging are strictly quantum mechanical. We show that ghost-image formation is fundamentally classical, with the image being expressible in terms of the phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive cross correlations between the detected fields. We then consider ghost-imaging scenarios with either phase-insensitive or phase-sensitive sources, where the former are always classical but the latter may be classical or quantum mechanical. We show that if their auto-correlations are identical, then a quantum source provides resolution improvement in its near-field and field-of-view improvement in its far field when compared to a classical source. | |
| dc.description | 4 pages, 2 figures | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612070 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612070 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/120006 | |
| dc.subject | Quantum Physics | |
| dc.title | Ghost Imaging: What is quantum, what is not | |
| dc.type | text |