Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems

Simple item page
dc.creatorKastner, Ruth E.
dc.date2004-08-17
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:10:39Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:10:39Z
dc.descriptionTim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin's argument is taken as ruling out Cramer's heuristic ``pseudotime'' explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many.
dc.descriptionTo appear in Synthese
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408109
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408109
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/92307
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.subjectPopular Physics
dc.titleCramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv