Evolutionary Catastrophes and the Goldilocks Problem

Simple item page
dc.creatorCirkovic, Milan M.
dc.date2007-09-14
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:51:29Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T08:51:29Z
dc.descriptionOne of the mainstays of the controversial "rare Earth" hypothesis is the "Goldilocks problem" regarding various parameters describing a habitable planet, partially involving the role of mass extinctions and other catastrophic processes in biological evolution. Usually, this is construed as support for the uniqueness of the Earth's biosphere and intelligent human life. Here I argue that this is a misconstrual and that, on the contrary, observation-selection effects, when applied to catastrophic processes, make it very difficult for us to discern whether the terrestrial biosphere and evolutionary processes which created it are exceptional in the Milky Way or not. In particular, an anthropic overconfidence bias related to the temporal asymmetry of evolutionary processes appears when we try to straightforwardly estimate catastrophic risks from the past records on Earth. This agnosticism, in turn, supports the validity and significance of practical astrobiological and SETI research.
dc.description9 pages, 3 figures, International Journal of Astrobiology, accepted for publication
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2309
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2309
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Astrobiology, vol. 6, pp. 325-329 (2007)
dc.identifierdoi:10.1017/S1473550407003916
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/144951
dc.subjectAstrophysics
dc.subjectGeophysics
dc.subjectPhysics and Society
dc.subjectPopulations and Evolution
dc.titleEvolutionary Catastrophes and the Goldilocks Problem
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv