Why the HBT data are not in agreement with a single chemical and kinetic freeze-out
| dc.creator | Renk, Thorsten | |
| dc.date | 2004-07-14 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T03:52:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T03:52:53Z | |
| dc.description | Based on simple scale arguments we argue that any thermalized fireball evolution scenario which is in agreement with the observed Hanbury-Brown Twiss (HBT) correlation radii at RHIC and reproduces the measured total multiplicity cannot reflect the distribution of matter at or close to a phase transition temperature of ~170 MeV and any scenario which assumes that HBT reflects these properties cannot be reached by a sensible choice of evolution parameters while agreeing with all correlation radii. We investigate this question in more detail using a parametrized version of the fireball evolution which has been shown to reproduce particle spectra and HBT for a separate chemical and kinetic freeze-out. | |
| dc.description | 12 pages, 2 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. C | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0407164 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0407164 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/43629 | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | |
| dc.title | Why the HBT data are not in agreement with a single chemical and kinetic freeze-out | |
| dc.type | text |