A Comment on ``Superconducting-Normal Phase Transition in (Ba1-xKx)BiO3, x = 0.40, 0.47'' by B. F. Woodfield, D. A. Wright, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999)

Simple item page
dc.creatorKumar, P.
dc.creatorHall, Donavan
dc.creatorGoodrich, R. G.
dc.date1999-12-09
dc.date2000-01-10
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T03:15:30Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T03:15:30Z
dc.descriptionThis comment addresses criticisms of our PRL 82 (1999) p. 4532-4535 (cond-mat/9904288) raised by Woodfield et al. in their recent PRL. We find that the critical fields in single crystals of Ba1-xKxBiO3 (x = 0.4) have anomalous temperature dependecies which suggests that the superconducting phase transition in this material is not of order II.
dc.description2 pages, no figures, submitted to PRL as a comment, related articles are cond-mat/9904288 (theory) and cond-mat/9912160 (experiment)
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9912164
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9912164
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/30047
dc.subjectSuperconductivity
dc.titleA Comment on ``Superconducting-Normal Phase Transition in (Ba1-xKx)BiO3, x = 0.40, 0.47'' by B. F. Woodfield, D. A. Wright, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999)
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv