TSQT `Elements of Possibility'?

dc.creatorKastner, R. E.
dc.date1998-12-12
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:15:55Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:15:55Z
dc.descriptionI defend my arguments in quant-ph/9806002, which have recently been criticized by L. Vaidman (quant-ph/9811092). I emphasize that the correct usage of the ABL rule applies not to a genuine counterfactual statement but rather to a conjunction of material conditionals. I argue that the only kind of valid counterfactual statement one can make using the ABL rule is a ``might'' counterfactual, which is not adequate for the attribution of `elements of reality' to a quantum system.
dc.description4 pages, latex
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9812024
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9812024
dc.identifierStud.Hist.Philos.Mod.Phys. 30 (1999) 399-402
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/93905
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleTSQT `Elements of Possibility'?
dc.typetext

Files

Collections