Towards the Typology of Elections at Russia
| dc.creator | Sadovsky, Michael G. | |
| dc.creator | Gliskov, Alexander A. | |
| dc.date | 2007-06-24 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T08:12:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T08:12:09Z | |
| dc.description | A distinction in reasons and motives for choosing a particular political leader establishes the key difference between older and young democracy. The former is based on electoral history, while the latter is based on feelings and personal attitude. Besides, a comparatively abundant number of political figures (persons or parties and associations) is specific for young democracies. The problem of a reference votes' distribution is analyzed. Lefevbre's theory of a reflexive control is supposed to make the basis for indifferent choice of political figures. This theory yields a golden section split of votes (or the series of Fibonacci numbers, for the case of multiple choice). A typology of political campaigns based on this theory is proposed. A proximity of ratings of competing persons means the highest electoral tension, a leadership of a person means a high level of mobilization; a neutral situation corresponds to Fibonacci numbers distribution of votes. | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3521 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3521 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/132353 | |
| dc.subject | Physics and Society | |
| dc.title | Towards the Typology of Elections at Russia | |
| dc.type | text |