Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect"

Simple item page
dc.creatorSrikanth, R.
dc.date2000-07-10
dc.date2000-07-11
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T01:54:20Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T01:54:20Z
dc.descriptionIn response to the comments of astro-ph/0006426 on Srikanth (Icarus 1999), we clarify, and thereby justify, the definition of Poynting-Robertson drag adopted in the latter. We confirm that dust absorption is a necessary condition while re-emission is neither necessary nor sufficient for the inspiralling of a rest-isotropically emitting dust.
dc.descriptionTypographical error in a reference corrected
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007122
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007122
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/1305
dc.subjectAstrophysics
dc.titleComment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv