How definitive is the standard interpretation of Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem?

Simple item page
dc.creatorAnand, Bhupinder Singh
dc.date2003-07-05
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T04:59:26Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T04:59:26Z
dc.descriptionStandard interpretations of Goedel's "undecidable" proposition, [(Ax)R(x)], argue that, although [~(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable if [(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable, we may not conclude from this that [~(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable. We show that such interpretations are inconsistent with a standard Deduction Theorem of first order theories.
dc.description12 pages; an HTML version is available at http://alixcomsi.com/How_definitive_is_the_standard.htm
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0307074
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0307074
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/67987
dc.subjectGeneral Mathematics
dc.subject03B10
dc.titleHow definitive is the standard interpretation of Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem?
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv