Reply to a revised comment on "Why is the DNA denaturation transition first order?"

Simple item page
dc.creatorKafri, Y.
dc.creatorMukamel, D.
dc.creatorPeliti, L.
dc.date2003-02-27
dc.date2003-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T02:49:49Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T02:49:49Z
dc.descriptionIt is shown that the scaling analysis presented in Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4988 (2000) is valid for finite chains of lengths relevant to experiments, in contrast to a recent claim made by A. Hanke and R. Metzler in cond-mat/0110164.
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0302589
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0302589
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/20950
dc.subjectStatistical Mechanics
dc.subjectSoft Condensed Matter
dc.subjectQuantitative Biology
dc.titleReply to a revised comment on "Why is the DNA denaturation transition first order?"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv