Lucarelli et al. reply to Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493)
| dc.creator | Lucarelli, A. | |
| dc.creator | Lupi, S. | |
| dc.creator | Ortolani, M. | |
| dc.creator | Calvani, P. | |
| dc.creator | Maselli, P. | |
| dc.creator | Capizzi, M. | |
| dc.date | 2003-03-28 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T02:50:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T02:50:28Z | |
| dc.description | In their Comment to a recent paper of ours [Lucarelli et al., PRL 92, 037002 (2003)], Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493) argue that the samples of La(2-x)Sr(x)CuO(4) where we find far-infrared peaks below 150 cm-1 (which suggest a charge stripe scenario) are not single crystals or are miscut. Here we show that the spectral feature on which this criticism is based was found both in floating-zone-grown crystals where the miscut was negligible, and in flux-grown crystals where the surface is intrinsically a-b. Further arguments are presented to support the validity of our data. | |
| dc.description | 2 pages, 1 figure, submitted to PRL | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303606 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303606 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/21117 | |
| dc.subject | Superconductivity | |
| dc.subject | Strongly Correlated Electrons | |
| dc.title | Lucarelli et al. reply to Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493) | |
| dc.type | text |