Lucarelli et al. reply to Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493)

dc.creatorLucarelli, A.
dc.creatorLupi, S.
dc.creatorOrtolani, M.
dc.creatorCalvani, P.
dc.creatorMaselli, P.
dc.creatorCapizzi, M.
dc.date2003-03-28
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T02:50:28Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T02:50:28Z
dc.descriptionIn their Comment to a recent paper of ours [Lucarelli et al., PRL 92, 037002 (2003)], Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493) argue that the samples of La(2-x)Sr(x)CuO(4) where we find far-infrared peaks below 150 cm-1 (which suggest a charge stripe scenario) are not single crystals or are miscut. Here we show that the spectral feature on which this criticism is based was found both in floating-zone-grown crystals where the miscut was negligible, and in flux-grown crystals where the surface is intrinsically a-b. Further arguments are presented to support the validity of our data.
dc.description2 pages, 1 figure, submitted to PRL
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303606
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303606
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/21117
dc.subjectSuperconductivity
dc.subjectStrongly Correlated Electrons
dc.titleLucarelli et al. reply to Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493)
dc.typetext

Files

Collections