Near Rationality and Competitive Equilibria in Networked Systems

dc.creatorChristin, Nicolas
dc.creatorGrossklags, Jens
dc.creatorChuang, John
dc.date2004-04-20
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T03:21:08Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T03:21:08Z
dc.descriptionA growing body of literature in networked systems research relies on game theory and mechanism design to model and address the potential lack of cooperation between self-interested users. Most game-theoretic models applied to system research only describe competitive equilibria in terms of pure Nash equilibria, that is, a situation where the strategy of each user is deterministic, and is her best response to the strategies of all the other users. However, the assumptions necessary for a pure Nash equilibrium to hold may be too stringent for practical systems. Using three case studies on computer security, TCP congestion control, and network formation, we outline the limits of game-theoretic models relying on Nash equilibria, and we argue that considering competitive equilibria of a more general form may help reconcile predictions from game-theoretic models with empirically observed behavior.
dc.description13 pages, no figures
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0404040
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0404040
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/32082
dc.subjectComputer Science and Game Theory
dc.subjectNetworking and Internet Architecture
dc.subjectC.2
dc.titleNear Rationality and Competitive Equilibria in Networked Systems
dc.typetext

Files

Collections