Response to a critique of the Borexino result in "A new experimental limit for the stability of the electron" by H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, I.V. Krivosheina and I.V. Titkova

Simple item page
dc.creatorBorexino collaboration
dc.creatorBack, H. O.
dc.date2007-03-29
dc.date2007-05-01
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T07:58:51Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T07:58:51Z
dc.descriptionA recently published article by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al. critiques the limit on the stability of the electron obtained by the Borexino collaboration. We respond here to the criticisms raised by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and his colleagues, and re-establish that our result is based on very conservative premises and that the "indication of a signal of 1.4 $σ$" for the decay of the electron in the $γ+ν$ channel, reported by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and colleagues, is excluded by the Borexino result.
dc.description6 pages
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0703044
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0703044
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/128157
dc.subjectHigh Energy Physics - Experiment
dc.titleResponse to a critique of the Borexino result in "A new experimental limit for the stability of the electron" by H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, I.V. Krivosheina and I.V. Titkova
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv