Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Calculated from Density Functional Theory and the Empirical pi-Bond Model
| dc.creator | Shah, Deep | |
| dc.creator | Bruque, Nicolas A. | |
| dc.creator | Alam, Khairul | |
| dc.creator | Lake, Roger K. | |
| dc.creator | Pandey, Rajeev R. | |
| dc.date | 2007-04-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T07:55:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T07:55:53Z | |
| dc.description | The validity of the DFT models implemented by FIREBALL for CNT electronic device modeling is assessed. The effective masses, band gaps, and transmission coefficients of semi-conducting, zigzag, (n,0) carbon nanotubes (CNTs) resulting from the ab initio tight-binding density functional theory (DFT) code FIREBALL and the empirical, nearest-neighbor pi-bond model are compared for all semiconducting n values 5 <(=) n <(=) 35. The DFT values for the effective masses differ from the pi-bond values by +(-) 9% over the range of n values, 17 <(=) n <(=) 29, most important for electronic device applications. Over the range 13 <(=) n <(=) 35, the DFT bandgaps are less than the empirical bandgaps by 20-180 meV depending on the functional and the n value. The pi-bond model gives results that differ signifcantly from the DFT results when the CNT diameter goes below 1 nm due to the large curvature of the CNT. The pi-bond model quickly becomes inaccurate away from the bandedges for a (10, 0) CNT, and it is completely inaccurate for n <(=) 8. | |
| dc.description | J. Computational Electronics (accepted, 20 February 2007) | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.1168 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.1168 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/127118 | |
| dc.subject | Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics | |
| dc.subject | Materials Science | |
| dc.title | Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Calculated from Density Functional Theory and the Empirical pi-Bond Model | |
| dc.type | text |