Examples and counterexamples for Perles' conjecture

dc.creatorHaase, Christian
dc.creatorZiegler, Günter M.
dc.date2000-11-22
dc.date2001-07-19
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:32:50Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:32:50Z
dc.descriptionThe combinatorial structure of a d-dimensional simple convex polytope can be reconstructed from its abstract graph [Blind & Mani 1987, Kalai 1988]. However, no polynomial/efficient algorithm is known for this task, although a polynomially checkable certificate for the correct reconstruction was found by [Joswig, Kaibel & Koerner 2000]. A much stronger certificate would be given by the following characterization of the facet subgraphs, conjectured by M. Perles: ``The facet subgraphs of the graph of a simple d-polytope are exactly all the (d-1)-regular, connected, induced, non-separating subgraphs'' [Perles 1970]. We give examples for the validity of Perles conjecture: In particular, it holds for the duals of cyclic polytopes, and for the duals of stacked polytopes. On the other hand, we identify a topological obstruction that must be present in any counterexample to Perles' conjecture; thus, starting with a modification of ``Bing's house'', we construct explicit 4-dimensional counterexamples.
dc.description11 pages, 14 figures, see also http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/~ziegler
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0011170
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0011170
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/98994
dc.subjectCombinatorics
dc.subject52B05 (Primary); 05C75 (Secondary)
dc.titleExamples and counterexamples for Perles' conjecture
dc.typetext

Files

Collections