E = mc^2. Or Is It? : A Comment on Manuscript astro-ph/0504486

dc.creatorBakhoum, Ezzat G.
dc.date2005-08-11
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:55:40Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T05:55:40Z
dc.descriptionManuscript astro-ph/0504486 is a clear example of the fundamental conceptual flaw that had persisted for the past 100 years. Namely, the failure to realize that mass-energy equivalence, as applied to a propagating light particle (photon), is only a special case of a more general law that encompasses both photons and subluminal particles.
dc.description2 pages, no figures
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508071
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508071
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/87320
dc.subjectGeneral Physics
dc.titleE = mc^2. Or Is It? : A Comment on Manuscript astro-ph/0504486
dc.typetext

Files

Collections