Critique of "No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics"

Simple item page
dc.creatorSvetlichny, George
dc.date2002-08-07
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:04:44Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:04:44Z
dc.descriptionWe comment on the article of Ch. Simon, V. Buzek and N. Gisin: ``No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 170405, which argues that linearity of quantum mechanics follows from lack of superluminal signals and some usual hypotheses about measurements. We argue that such assumptions in the end are ineffective as an explanation of the linearity of quantum mechanics.
dc.description1 page, uses RevTeX 4, submitted to Physical Review Letters
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0208049
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0208049
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/90407
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleCritique of "No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv