Copied citations create renowned papers?
| dc.creator | Simkin, M. V. | |
| dc.creator | Roychowdhury, V. P. | |
| dc.date | 2003-05-08 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T02:51:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T02:51:13Z | |
| dc.description | Recently we discovered (cond-mat/0212043) that the majority of scientific citations are copied from the lists of references used in other papers. Here we show that a model, in which a scientist picks three random papers, cites them,and also copies a quarter of their references accounts quantitatively for empirically observed citation distribution. Simple mathematical probability, not genius, can explain why some papers are cited a lot more than the other. | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0305150 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0305150 | |
| dc.identifier | Annals Improb. Res. vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 24-27, 2005 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/21374 | |
| dc.subject | Disordered Systems and Neural Networks | |
| dc.subject | Physics and Society | |
| dc.title | Copied citations create renowned papers? | |
| dc.type | text |