Is diversity good?
| dc.creator | Bouville, Mathieu | |
| dc.date | 2007-04-19 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T09:25:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T09:25:25Z | |
| dc.description | Prominent ethical and policy issues such as affirmative action and female enrollment in science and engineering revolve around the idea that diversity is good. However, even though diversity is an ambiguous concept, a precise definition is seldom provided. We show that diversity may be construed as a factual description, a craving for symmetry, an intrinsic good, an instrumental good, a symptom, or a side effect. These acceptions differ vastly in their nature and properties. The first one cannot lead to any action and the second one is mistaken. Diversity as intrinsic good is a mere opinion, which cannot be concretely applied; moreover, the most commonly invoked forms of diversity (sexual and racial) are not intrinsically good. On the other hand, diversity as instrumental good can be evaluated empirically and can give rise to policies, but these may be very weak. Finally, symptoms and side effects are not actually about diversity. We consider the example of female enrollment in science and engineering, interpreting the various arguments found in the literature in light of this polysemy. Keywords: ethics, policy, higher education, female students, minority students, affirmative action | |
| dc.description | 7 pages | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2466 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2466 | |
| dc.identifier | Science and Engineering Ethics vol. 14, pp. 51-63 (2008) | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9032-7 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/156399 | |
| dc.subject | Physics and Society | |
| dc.title | Is diversity good? | |
| dc.type | text |