Is the Pentaquark the Only Justification for Research on KN Physics ?
| dc.creator | Gensini, P. M. | |
| dc.creator | Hurtado, R. | |
| dc.creator | Srivastava, Y. N. | |
| dc.creator | Violini, G. | |
| dc.date | 2007-05-14 | |
| dc.date | 2007-08-16 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T13:06:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T13:06:30Z | |
| dc.description | The talk is intended to motivate the use of DA$Φ$NE--2 running at the $ϕ$ peak as an intense, clean source of low--momentum charged and neutral kaons. It covers a few open problems still unsolved after more than twenty--five years and the physics (some of it still novel) that could be learned only in this way. And, of course, the answer to the above question is {\sl NO}. | |
| dc.description | Plain TeX 12+1 pages with 3 tables in the text, 3 .eps figures. Presented by G.V. at "EURIDICE: The Final Meeting", Kazimierz, Poland, August 24 -- 27, 2006; v2: minor (one word!) editing by referee; v3: final version to appear in Acta Physica Polonica B 38, n.9 (2007), with further minor corrections | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1764 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1764 | |
| dc.identifier | Acta Phys.Polon.B38:2911-2922,2007 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/227800 | |
| dc.subject | Nuclear Theory | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Experiment | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | |
| dc.subject | Nuclear Experiment | |
| dc.title | Is the Pentaquark the Only Justification for Research on KN Physics ? | |
| dc.type | text |