Risk management for analytical methods: conciliating objectives of methods, validation phase and routine decision rules

dc.creatorMaumy, Myriam
dc.creatorBoulanger, B.
dc.creatorDewe, W.
dc.creatorGilbert, A.
dc.creatorGovaerts, B.
dc.date2007-12-31
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:52:01Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T08:52:01Z
dc.descriptionIn the industries that involved either chemistry or biology, such as pharmaceutical industries, chemical industries or food industry, the analytical methods are the necessary eyes and hear of all the material produced or used. If the quality of an analytical method is doubtful, then the whole set of decision that will be based on those measures is questionable. For those reasons, being able to assess the quality of an analytical method is far more than a statistical challenge; it's a matter of ethic and good business practices. Many regulatory documents have been releases, primarily ICH and FDA documents in the pharmaceutical industry (FDA, 1995, 1997, 2001) to address that issue.
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0207
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0207
dc.identifierDans Actes du congrès de Chimiométrie 2005 - Risk management for analytical methods: conciliating objectives of methods, validation phase and routine decision rules., France (2005)
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/145137
dc.subjectApplications
dc.subjectStatistics Theory
dc.titleRisk management for analytical methods: conciliating objectives of methods, validation phase and routine decision rules
dc.typetext

Files

Collections