Comment on "Feasibility of an electron-based crystalline undulator"

dc.creatorBiryukov, V. M.
dc.date2007-12-23
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:51:10Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T08:51:10Z
dc.descriptionTabrizi et al. [physics/0701342] discuss the feasibility of an electron-based crystal undulator (e-CU) by planar channeling of 50 GeV electrons through a periodically bent crystal. We show that their scheme is not feasible. First, their undulator parameter is K >> 1 always, which destroys photon interference. Second, they overestimate the electron dechanneling length in e-CU by an order of magnitude, which shortens the number N of e-CU periods from 5-15 (as they hope) to just 1-2. This kills their e-CU concept again. We made first simulation of electron channeling in undulated crystal and conclude that an electron-based crystal wiggler is feasible with wiggler strength K=10 and number of periods N=2.
dc.description4 pages, 1 figure
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3904
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3904
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/144842
dc.subjectAccelerator Physics
dc.titleComment on "Feasibility of an electron-based crystalline undulator"
dc.typetext

Files

Collections