The Nuclear Force is Gravitation. Was Einstein Right?
| dc.creator | Goradia, Shantilal G. | |
| dc.date | 2000-10-24 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T05:44:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T05:44:57Z | |
| dc.description | I combine the effects of Planck length, general relativity and Newtonian gravity in one equation, to come up with a semi-classical model of gravity in the form of deviation from Newtonian gravity. Einstein explained nuclear forces in terms of gravity (Ref. 2). This reference is explicit in expressing Einstein's attempts and describes them as misguided. My model shows Einstein was not misguided in his attempts to explain nuclear forces in terms of gravity. My model shows just the contrary. I use Planck length as what it is: minimum distance that makes any sense. I make a subatomic distinction between mass and space, a lesson learned from general relativity. General relativity is about mass telling space how to curve and space telling mass how to move. Unlike string theory, I use no imaginary dimensions. My model predicts maximum nuclear force as the limit of gravitation and clearly yields Newtonian gravity at a macroscopic scale in an unprecedented and consistent manner: Good-by to quantum gravity. I am combining Newton, Planck and Einstein and to predict a limit of gravity as Chandrashekhar did to predict his limit. | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0010059 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0010059 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/83842 | |
| dc.subject | General Physics | |
| dc.title | The Nuclear Force is Gravitation. Was Einstein Right? | |
| dc.type | text |