Categoricity over P for first order T or categoricity for phi in L_{omega_1 omega} can stop at aleph_k while holding for aleph_0, ..., aleph_{k-1}

Simple item page
dc.creatorHart, Bradd
dc.creatorShelah, Saharon
dc.date1990-01-15
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T09:14:42Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T09:14:42Z
dc.descriptionSuppose L is a relational language and P in L is a unary predicate. If M is an L-structure then P(M) is the L-structure formed as the substructure of M with domain {a: M models P(a)}. Now suppose T is a complete first order theory in L with infinite models. Following Hodges, we say that T is relatively lambda-categorical if whenever M, N models T, P(M)=P(N), |P(M)|= lambda then there is an isomorphism i:M-> N which is the identity on P(M). T is relatively categorical if it is relatively lambda-categorical for every lambda. The question arises whether the relative lambda-categoricity of T for some lambda >|T| implies that T is relatively categorical. In this paper, we provide an example, for every k>0, of a theory T_k and an L_{omega_1 omega} sentence varphi_k so that T_k is relatively aleph_n-categorical for n < k and varphi_k is aleph_n-categorical for n<k but T_k is not relatively beth_k-categorical and varphi_k is not beth_k-categorical.
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/9201240
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/9201240
dc.identifierIsrael J. Math. 70 (1990), 219--235
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/152767
dc.subjectLogic
dc.titleCategoricity over P for first order T or categoricity for phi in L_{omega_1 omega} can stop at aleph_k while holding for aleph_0, ..., aleph_{k-1}
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv