Implications of unitarity and precision measurements on CKM matrix elements
| dc.creator | Ahuja, Gulsheen | |
| dc.creator | Gupta, Manmohan | |
| dc.creator | Kumar, Sanjeev | |
| dc.creator | Randhawa, Monika | |
| dc.date | 2006-08-07 | |
| dc.date | 2006-12-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T10:25:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T10:25:15Z | |
| dc.description | Unitarity along with precision measurements of sin2β, V_{us} and V_{cb} allows one to find a lower bound V_{ub}\geq 0.0035 which, on using the recently measured angle αof the unitarity triangle, translates to V_{ub}= 0.0035\pm 0.0002. This precise value, stable for a good deal of changes in α, along with CP violating phase δfound from unitarity allows the construction of a `precise' CKM matrix. The above unitarity based value of V_{ub} is in agreement with the latest exclusive value used as input by UTfit, CKMfitter, HFAG, however underlines the so called `tension' faced by the latest inclusive V_{ub}=0.00449 \pm 0.00033. Further, using this inclusive value of V_{ub} along with the latest sin2β, one finds δ=23 ^{\rm o}- 39 ^{\rm o}, again in conflict with δmeasured in B-decays. The calculated ranges of the elements of the CKM matrix are in excellent agreement with those obtained recently by UTfit, CKMfitter and HFAG. Also, the ratio \frac{V_{ts}}{V_{td}} is in agreement with its latest measured value, whereas there is some disagreement between the `measured' and the calculated V_{td} values. | |
| dc.description | 10 pages, 1 figure, incorporated latest data | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0608074 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0608074 | |
| dc.identifier | Phys.Lett.B647:394-399,2007 | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.02.005 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/176479 | |
| dc.subject | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | |
| dc.title | Implications of unitarity and precision measurements on CKM matrix elements | |
| dc.type | text |